Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jo Bisseker Barr's avatar

Hmmm... not sure how open you might be to a therapist's interpretation on your thoughts....?

I'm less convinced by the 'ADHD brain' being responsible for your thinking, and wonder if you might instead consider what your internal drivers might be, and from where they came?

Like you, I too have written memoir. I'm still on that arduous, painful journey of angst and application and intense focus, and time taken up; what I do know about myself is I was a 'good conscientious girl' and rewarded for academic application. I think that finding a publisher for my memoir is mixed up with this validation; it's the difficult challenge I'm re-enacting, but for me, the reward of that feels like acceptance. (it's also a hell of an achievement! And reading has been a key part of my whole life. I love books, and I love writing!)

I don't know if that's helpful to think about? How were you put together, and what of those early dynamics became imprinted into your drivers?

Richard's avatar

On the subject (and scale) of non-rating our writerly achievements, I can lower you: I wrote two guidebooks in which I didn't even suggest the idea to a publisher. Said publisher came to me, and the two books would have happened with or without me.

That doesn't mean I didn't do a good job — I think I did — and I'm not proud of them — I am. But, rightly or wrongly, they do feel much less estimable to me than something like Floating or your new Peaks guidebook. My friends got really, generously excited when each of my two books came out, and were always quite puzzled at how un-ecstatic I was. I guess, ultimately, I feel more admiration is due when an idea has been hatched from scratch and experts have been persuaded to its merits. Maybe that's quite reasonable, or maybe it's a flawed, self-critical value system I need to work on.

No posts

Ready for more?